RecordLens

Claim review. Product claims

Outdated

The claim described an earlier position that has since changed.

The US EPA's February 2020 interim registration review decision found that glyphosate is unlikely to be a human carcinogen.

About
Bayer AG
Claim made by
US Environmental Protection Agency, regulator statement
Published
February 2020
Original
Glyphosate Interim Registration Review Decision
Evidence score
86 How it was scored
Last reviewed
25 October 2026

Why this label

The claim was accurate when the decision issued. EPA's own page says the February 2020 interim decision found glyphosate unlikely to be a human carcinogenS2. The decision was challenged in the Ninth Circuit in March 2020. In June 2022 the court vacated the human health portionS2. In September 2022 EPA missed a court deadline on the ecological portion and withdrew the interim decisionS2. EPA says the withdrawal does not by itself mean its scientific findings are wrong, and it still cites its 2017 assessmentS2. The 2020 interim decision no longer stands as a decision, so a reader citing it as current EPA policy would be relying on a superseded record.

Current procedural position

Human health portion vacated by the Ninth Circuit in June 2022. Interim decision withdrawn by EPA in September 2022. Updated human health risk assessment anticipated in late 2026 as of 26 August 2026S2.

Record supporting the assessment

The Ninth Circuit vacated the human health portion of EPA's ID.
S2 Tier A US Environmental Protection Agency, Glyphosate, Last updated 26 August 2026
EPA was unable to finalize a new ecological portion by the court-imposed deadline and withdrew the glyphosate ID.
S2 Tier A US Environmental Protection Agency, Glyphosate, Last updated 26 August 2026

Conflicting or limiting record

unlikely to be a human carcinogen
S2 Tier A US Environmental Protection Agency, Glyphosate, Last updated 26 August 2026

Evidence score: 86 of 100

The score grades how well the record establishes this assessment. It is not a score of Bayer AG. Score = source authority + directness + corroboration + procedural accuracy + currency + reproducibility.

ComponentPointsMaxReason
Source authorityIs the source competent to establish the proposition?2730EPA is the competent regulator and describes its own decision history.
DirectnessDoes the source state the proposition or only discuss adjacent facts?1920The page states the vacatur and the withdrawal in plain terms.
CorroborationDo independent records support the same material point?915The Ninth Circuit ruling itself was not read, so the record rests on EPA's account.
Procedural accuracyDoes the record settle the procedural state the claim describes?1215The vacatur and withdrawal are settled, but the replacement decision is pending.
CurrencyHas the record been checked against later developments?1010Checked against the EPA page updated 26 August 2026.
ReproducibilityCan a reader locate the passage and repeat the assessment?910The EPA page is public.
Total86100

Timeline

  1. EPA issues the glyphosate interim decisionS2
  2. Decision challenged in the Ninth CircuitS2
  3. Ninth Circuit vacates the human health portionS2
  4. EPA withdraws the interim decisionS2

Revision history

  • Assessment first published with label Outdated.

Have a record that changes this assessment? See corrections and responses.

Sources

  1. S2Tier A GlyphosateUS Environmental Protection Agency. Regulator press release. Last updated 26 August 2026.EPA page on its cancer conclusion, the 2022 vacatur and withdrawal of the 2020 interim decision, and the pending update. It does not give a date for a new registration decision.Link working, checked 25 October 2026

Other claims about Bayer AG