The claim described an earlier position that has since changed.
BHP said on 25 October 2024 that the BRL 170 billion Fundao agreement with Brazilian public authorities remained subject to approval by the Brazilian Supreme Court.
The Agreement remains subject to approval by the Brazilian Supreme Court.
- About
- BHP Group Limited
- Claim made by
- BHP Group Limited, company statement
- Published
- 25 October 2024
- Evidence score
- 79 How it was scored
- Last reviewed
- 25 October 2026
Why this label
The statement was accurate on 25 October 2024S4. The release gives the financial value of R$170 billion on a 100 percent basis, including amounts already spent, and names the federal government, the states of Minas Gerais and Espirito Santo, prosecutors and public defenders as counterpartiesS4. On 7 November 2024 BHP announced that the agreement was ratified by the Supreme Court of Brazil on 6 November 2024S5. The approval condition no longer describes the current position. The agreement does not resolve the UK group actionS4.
Current procedural position
Agreement signed on 25 October 2024S4 and ratified by the Supreme Court of Brazil on 6 November 2024S5.
Record supporting the assessment
was ratified by the Supreme Court of Brazil in Brasilia on 6 November 2024
Conflicting or limiting record
The Agreement remains subject to approval by the Brazilian Supreme Court.
Evidence score: 79 of 100
The score grades how well the record establishes this assessment. It is not a score of BHP Group Limited. Score = source authority + directness + corroboration + procedural accuracy + currency + reproducibility.
| Component | Points | Max | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source authorityIs the source competent to establish the proposition? | 21 | 30 | Company filings are competent for the terms and the announced ratification. The court order was not read. |
| DirectnessDoes the source state the proposition or only discuss adjacent facts? | 19 | 20 | Both filings state the point directly. |
| CorroborationDo independent records support the same material point? | 8 | 15 | Both statements come from BHP. |
| Procedural accuracyDoes the record settle the procedural state the claim describes? | 12 | 15 | Ratification is reported as done. |
| CurrencyHas the record been checked against later developments? | 9 | 10 | No later reversal was found. |
| ReproducibilityCan a reader locate the passage and repeat the assessment? | 10 | 10 | Both filings are public. |
| Total | 79 | 100 |
Timeline
Related cases
- Brazilian public authorities, Samarco Mineração S.A., BHP Billiton Brasil Ltda. and Vale S.A.Supreme Federal Court of Brazil (ratification). Civil. Not stated in the sources read.Stage: Ratified on 6 November 2024
- Agreement ratifiedS5
Revision history
- Assessment first published with label Outdated.
Have a record that changes this assessment? See corrections and responses.
Sources
- S5Tier B Samarco update - Ratification of agreement with Brazilian Public AuthoritiesBHP Group Limited. Company statement. 7 November 2024.Company announcement of ratification on 6 November 2024. The court order itself was not read.Link working, checked 25 October 2026
- S4Tier B BHP Brasil reaches final settlement with Public Authorities in Brazil for reparation of Samarco's Fundão dam failureBHP Group Limited. Company filing. 25 October 2024.Company statement on the BRL 170 billion agreement and its parties. It lists the UK action as unresolved.
Other claims about BHP Group Limited
- Contradicted95BHP argued at trial in London that it was not a polluter under Brazilian environmental law and breached no legal duty, so it was not liable for the Fundao dam failure.Company statement, 14 November 20255 records citedSafety
- Supported95Reuters reported in November 2025 that London's High Court ruled BHP liable for the 2015 Fundao dam collapse in Brazil.Press report, 14 November 20253 records citedSafety
- Unresolved59BHP said in November 2025 that the UK group action duplicates remediation and compensation already provided in Brazil or available under the Brazil agreement.Company statement, 14 November 20252 records citedSafety