A reliable and applicable record states the opposite.
Privinvest and its owner Iskandar Safa denied any wrongdoing and said any payments were lawful.
- About
- Privinvest Group
- Claim made by
- Reuters, company statement
- Published
- 29 July 2024
- Evidence score
- 85 How it was scored
- Last reviewed
- 25 October 2026
Why this label
Reuters reported that Privinvest and Mr Safa denied any wrongdoing and said any payments were lawfulS7. The English Commercial Court reached the opposite conclusion on the civil record. Counsel for Mozambique said the court found the debt was procured by bribery orchestrated by PrivinvestS6, and the judgment records payments by Privinvest Shipbuilding SAL that the group acceptedS4. The court refused permission to appealS5, and counsel for Mozambique reports the Court of Appeal struck out the appeal on 6 May 2026, so the judgment is final against the Privinvest entitiesS11. A US jury did acquit the group's salesman on criminal charges in 2019, a different standard and forumS8. On the civil record now final the denial that the payments were lawful is contradicted.
Current procedural position
Denial stated at the time of the July 2024 trialS7. Contradicted by the civil judgment of 29 July 2024, now final after the appeal was struck out on 6 May 2026S4S11.
Record supporting the assessment
the disputed debt was procured by bribery and corruption orchestrated by Privinvest
the judgment of the Honourable Mr Justice Robin Knowles CBE of July 2024 is final
Conflicting or limiting record
denied any wrongdoing and said any payments were lawful
Evidence score: 85 of 100
The score grades how well the record establishes this assessment. It is not a score of Privinvest Group. Score = source authority + directness + corroboration + procedural accuracy + currency + reproducibility.
| Component | Points | Max | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source authorityIs the source competent to establish the proposition? | 27 | 30 | The judgment and counsel record outrank a reported denial on the civil question. |
| DirectnessDoes the source state the proposition or only discuss adjacent facts? | 16 | 20 | The denial is a general position, the judgment addresses the specific payments. |
| CorroborationDo independent records support the same material point? | 12 | 15 | DOJ records of the same scheme describe the payments as bribesS1. |
| Procedural accuracyDoes the record settle the procedural state the claim describes? | 13 | 15 | The contradicting civil judgment is final. |
| CurrencyHas the record been checked against later developments? | 9 | 10 | Checked against the 6 May 2026 struck out appeal outcomeS11. |
| ReproducibilityCan a reader locate the passage and repeat the assessment? | 8 | 10 | The denial and the judgment are both reported and public. |
| Total | 85 | 100 |
Timeline
Related cases
- The Republic of Mozambique v Credit Suisse International and others (Privinvest Defendants)High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England and Wales, Commercial Court. Civil. [2024] EWHC 1957 (Comm).Stage: Judgment given 29 July 2024. Permission to appeal refused 10 December 2024. Privinvest appeal struck out by the Court of Appeal on 6 May 2026, judgment final against Privinvest entitiesS11
Revision history
- Assessment first published with label Contradicted.
Have a record that changes this assessment? See corrections and responses.
Sources
- S6Tier B White & Case secures critical settlements for Republic of Mozambique in long-running multibillion-dollar debt disputeWhite & Case LLP (for the Republic of Mozambique). Company statement. 30 July 2024.Counsel for Mozambique states the bribery finding against Privinvest. It is a party statement and gives no damages figure.
- S11Tier B Tuna Bonds appeal successfully struck outPeters & Peters Solicitors LLP (for the Republic of Mozambique), reporter Brian McDonald. Company statement. 13 May 2026.Counsel for Mozambique reports the Court of Appeal struck out the Privinvest appeal by order of 6 May 2026 after the group did not meet security terms, so the July 2024 judgment is final against the Privinvest corporate entities. It states no damages figure.
- S7Tier C UPDATE 1-Mozambique 'substantially' wins UK lawsuit against Privinvest over 'tuna bond' scandalReuters (via CNBC Africa), reporter Sam Tobin. Press report. 29 July 2024.Reports the just over US$825 million award against Safa and Privinvest and the group's denial. Press colour, not the primary record.
- S1Tier A Former Finance Minister of Mozambique Convicted of Fraud and Money Laundering in $2 Billion SchemeUS Attorney's Office, Eastern District of New York. Regulator press release. 8 August 2024.Supports Chang's conviction, the Privinvest role and the bribe figures. It does not convict the company or Boustani.
- S5Tier A The Republic of Mozambique v Credit Suisse International & Ors [2024] EWHC 3188 (Comm)High Court of Justice, Commercial Court (National Archives). Court judgment. 10 December 2024.Judgment 13 refusing the Privinvest companies permission to appeal and ordering costs on account. It does not restate the damages sum.
- S4Tier A The Republic of Mozambique v Credit Suisse International and others [2024] EWHC 1957 (Comm)High Court of Justice, Commercial Court (National Archives). Court judgment. 29 July 2024.Records payments by Privinvest Shipbuilding SAL accepted by the group and Safa, and Safa's death after trial. We did not read every concluding paragraph.Link working, checked 25 October 2026
- S8Tier C Salesman cleared in $2-billion Mozambican scam in blow to U.S.Daily Maverick (Bloomberg wire). Press report. 3 December 2019.Reports the Brooklyn jury acquittal of Boustani on all three counts. Press report of a sealed verdict.
Other claims about Privinvest Group
- Supported92The US Department of Justice said a federal jury convicted former Mozambique finance minister Manuel Chang in August 2024 and named Privinvest Group executives as co-conspirators who paid bribes.Regulator statement, 8 August 20243 records citedBribery
- Supported80A Brooklyn federal jury acquitted Privinvest's lead salesman Jean Boustani on all counts in December 2019.Press report, 3 December 20192 records citedFraud
- Supported87The English Commercial Court ruled on 29 July 2024 that the Mozambique debt was procured by bribery orchestrated by Privinvest and found the Privinvest entities liable to the Republic.Company statement, 30 July 20243 records citedBribery