RecordLens

Claim review. Corporate status

Outdated

The claim described an earlier position that has since changed.

Purdue said in May 2023 that the Second Circuit had upheld its plan of reorganization, which included releases of opioid claims against members of the Sackler family.

About
Purdue Pharma L.P.
Claim made by
Purdue Pharma L.P., company statement
Published
30 May 2023
Original
Second Circuit Court Upholds Purdue Pharma’s Plan of Reorganization on Appeal
Evidence score
94 How it was scored
Last reviewed
25 October 2026

Why this label

The Second Circuit ruling, reported at 69 F.4th 45, was reversed by the US Supreme Court on 27 June 2024S3. The Court held that the bankruptcy code does not authorize a release and injunction that discharges claims against a nondebtor without the consent of affected claimantsS3. Justice Gorsuch wrote for five justices and Justice Kavanaugh dissented for fourS3. Purdue then filed a new plan. The bankruptcy court indicated on 14 November 2025 that it would approve itS4, and it entered a confirmation order on 18 November 2025S6. The 2023 plan described in the origin no longer exists as an approved plan. Only the title of the 2023 release was seen for this review.

Current procedural position

Second Circuit judgment reversed and remanded by the US Supreme Court on 27 June 2024S3. Replaced by a new plan confirmed on 18 November 2025S6.

Record supporting the assessment

69 F. 4th 45, reversed and remanded.
S3 Tier A Supreme Court of the United States, Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., No. 23-124, slip opinion, 27 June 2024
against a nondebtor without the consent of affected claimants.
S3 Tier A Supreme Court of the United States, Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., No. 23-124, slip opinion, 27 June 2024

Conflicting or limiting record

No record located that conflicts with this assessment.

Evidence score: 94 of 100

The score grades how well the record establishes this assessment. It is not a score of Purdue Pharma L.P.. Score = source authority + directness + corroboration + procedural accuracy + currency + reproducibility.

ComponentPointsMaxReason
Source authorityIs the source competent to establish the proposition?3030A Supreme Court opinion settles the validity of the releases.
DirectnessDoes the source state the proposition or only discuss adjacent facts?1820The opinion reverses the Second Circuit ruling by citation.
CorroborationDo independent records support the same material point?1215Purdue's 2025 release confirms a new plan replaced the old one.
Procedural accuracyDoes the record settle the procedural state the claim describes?1515The Supreme Court ruling is final.
CurrencyHas the record been checked against later developments?1010Checked against the May 2026 end of the bankruptcy.
ReproducibilityCan a reader locate the passage and repeat the assessment?910The opinion is on supremecourt.gov.
Total94100

Timeline

  1. Purdue announces the Second Circuit ruling
  2. Supreme Court reverses in Harrington v. Purdue PharmaS3
  3. Court indicates it will approve the new planS4
  4. Bankruptcy court enters the confirmation orderS6

Related cases

Revision history

  • Assessment first published with label Outdated.

Have a record that changes this assessment? See corrections and responses.

Sources

  1. S3Tier A Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., No. 23-124, slip opinionSupreme Court of the United States. Court judgment. 27 June 2024.Holds that nonconsensual releases of claims against nondebtors are not authorized. It does not address the later plan.Link working, checked 25 October 2026
  2. S4Tier B Bankruptcy Court to Confirm Purdue Pharma’s Plan of ReorganizationPurdue Pharma L.P. via Business Wire. Company statement. 14 November 2025.Company account of the court's indication of approval and the plan amounts. It is not the confirmation order.
  3. S6Tier A Notice of Bankruptcy Court Order Confirming Bankruptcy Plan and Enjoining Continuation of Proceedings as to Debtor Purdue Pharma, L.P., Affiliated Debtors, and Related PartiesUS District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (notice filed by the Sackler parties in MDL No. 2804, hosted by NAAG). Court filing. 21 November 2025.Court filing that cites the confirmation order of 18 November 2025 in case 19-23649 (SHL), ECF No. 8263. It is a party notice, not the order itself.Link working, checked 25 October 2026

Other claims about Purdue Pharma L.P.