RecordLens

Claim review. Fraud

Supported

The cited record supports the material proposition.

Credit Suisse settled the Republic of Mozambique's London claim over the loans on the eve of trial.

About
Credit Suisse Group AG
Claim made by
High Court of Justice, Commercial Court, court filing
Published
29 July 2024
Original
The Republic of Mozambique (acting through its Attorney General) -v- Credit Suisse International and others
Evidence score
81 How it was scored
Last reviewed
25 October 2026

Why this label

The judgment of Mr Justice Robin Knowles records that Credit Suisse and a number of other syndicated lenders reached a settlement with Mozambique on the eve of trialS2. It says the claims of the syndicated lenders were settled except for BCP, and that the settlements left a number of issues the judge did not need to decide. The part of the judgment we read does not state the settlement terms, so this record supports the fact of settlement but not any amount. A settlement is not a finding against the bank.

Current procedural position

Settled between Mozambique and Credit Suisse before trial. Judgment on remaining parties given 29 July 2024 in [2024] EWHC 1957 (Comm)S2.

Record supporting the assessment

Credit Suisse and a number of other banks who were syndicated lenders reached a settlement with Mozambique.
S2 Tier A High Court of Justice, Commercial Court (National Archives), The Republic of Mozambique (acting through its Attorney General) v Credit Suisse International and others [2024] EWHC 1957 (Comm), 29 July 2024
Claims of the banks who were syndicated lenders under the transactions were settled, except for BCP.
S2 Tier A High Court of Justice, Commercial Court (National Archives), The Republic of Mozambique (acting through its Attorney General) v Credit Suisse International and others [2024] EWHC 1957 (Comm), 29 July 2024

Conflicting or limiting record

No record located that conflicts with this assessment.

Evidence score: 81 of 100

The score grades how well the record establishes this assessment. It is not a score of Credit Suisse Group AG. Score = source authority + directness + corroboration + procedural accuracy + currency + reproducibility.

ComponentPointsMaxReason
Source authorityIs the source competent to establish the proposition?2830The trial judge's record of the settlement is competent.
DirectnessDoes the source state the proposition or only discuss adjacent facts?1720The judgment states the settlement but not its terms.
CorroborationDo independent records support the same material point?715We did not read a second record of the settlement terms.
Procedural accuracyDoes the record settle the procedural state the claim describes?1315A settlement recorded by the court is settled.
CurrencyHas the record been checked against later developments?710We could not check later appeals by other parties.
ReproducibilityCan a reader locate the passage and repeat the assessment?910The judgment is on the National Archives case law site.
Total81100

Timeline

  1. Judgment records the eve of trial settlementS2

Related cases

Revision history

  • Assessment first published with label Supported.

Have a record that changes this assessment? See corrections and responses.

Sources

  1. S2Tier A The Republic of Mozambique (acting through its Attorney General) v Credit Suisse International and others [2024] EWHC 1957 (Comm)High Court of Justice, Commercial Court (National Archives). Court judgment. 29 July 2024.Records the eve of trial settlement and the three borrowers. We did not read its final orders on other parties.Link working, checked 25 October 2026

Other claims about Credit Suisse Group AG