The cited record supports the material proposition.
The SEC said in November 2011 that a federal court ordered Raj Rajaratnam to pay a US$92.8 million civil penalty in its insider trading case.
finds Rajaratnam liable for a civil monetary penalty of $92,805,705
- About
- Galleon Group LLC
- Claim made by
- US Securities and Exchange Commission, regulator statement
- Published
- 8 November 2011
- Evidence score
- 90 How it was scored
- Last reviewed
- 25 October 2026
Why this label
The SEC release states that the US District Court for the Southern District of New York ordered Rajaratnam to pay a civil penalty of US$92,805,705S4. It names the Honorable Jed S. Rakoff and dates the judgment 8 November 2011. The release says combined civil and criminal sanctions passed US$156.6 million, and that the disgorgement was deemed satisfied by the criminal forfeiture. This is a civil final judgment, separate from the criminal conviction. The record settles the penalty figure and the procedural state.
Current procedural position
Civil final judgment entered on 8 November 2011 by Judge Jed S. Rakoff, finalS4.
Record supporting the assessment
finds Rajaratnam liable for a civil monetary penalty of $92,805,705
The total amount of monetary sanctions imposed on Rajaratnam in the civil and criminal cases is more than $156.6 million
Conflicting or limiting record
No record located that conflicts with this assessment.
Evidence score: 90 of 100
The score grades how well the record establishes this assessment. It is not a score of Galleon Group LLC. Score = source authority + directness + corroboration + procedural accuracy + currency + reproducibility.
| Component | Points | Max | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source authorityIs the source competent to establish the proposition? | 29 | 30 | An SEC release on its own civil judgment is a competent record. |
| DirectnessDoes the source state the proposition or only discuss adjacent facts? | 19 | 20 | The release states the penalty amount and the court order directly. |
| CorroborationDo independent records support the same material point? | 10 | 15 | The criminal forfeiture in the US Attorney release aligns with the combined total. |
| Procedural accuracyDoes the record settle the procedural state the claim describes? | 14 | 15 | The civil judgment is final, with disgorgement deemed satisfied by the forfeiture. |
| CurrencyHas the record been checked against later developments? | 9 | 10 | Checked to October 2026, with no later change found. |
| ReproducibilityCan a reader locate the passage and repeat the assessment? | 9 | 10 | The SEC release is public. |
| Total | 90 | 100 |
Timeline
Related cases
- SEC v. Galleon Management, LP, Raj Rajaratnam and othersUS District Court for the Southern District of New York. Civil. 09-CV-8811 (JSR).Stage: Final. Civil penalty judgment entered 8 November 2011S4
Revision history
- Assessment first published with label Supported.
Have a record that changes this assessment? See corrections and responses.
Sources
- S4Tier A SEC Obtains Record $92.8 Million Penalty Against Raj RajaratnamUS Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulator press release. 8 November 2011.Supports the US$92.8 million civil penalty, Judge Rakoff, the 8 November 2011 date and the SEC's own largest ever characterization. The record claim is the SEC's own wording.
- S2Tier A SEC v. Galleon Management, LP, et al., Litigation Release No. 21255US Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulator press release. 16 October 2009.Supports the case caption, the Southern District of New York court and case number 09-CV-8811 (JSR). It states allegations only.
- S1Tier A SEC Charges Billionaire Hedge Fund Manager Raj Rajaratnam with Insider TradingUS Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulator press release. 16 October 2009.Supports the SEC charges and the more than US$25 million illicit gains figure. It is an allegation, not a finding.
Other claims about Galleon Group LLC
- Supported94The US Attorney for the Southern District of New York said in October 2011 that Galleon founder Raj Rajaratnam was convicted on all 14 counts and sentenced to 11 years in prison for insider trading.Regulator statement, 13 October 20113 records citedMarket conduct
- Contradicted91On appeal Raj Rajaratnam argued that the FBI wiretaps used against him were unlawfully authorized and that his conviction should be reversed.Court filing, 24 June 20131 record citedMarket conduct
- Partly supported74The SEC said the US$92.8 million penalty against Raj Rajaratnam was the largest ever assessed against an individual in an SEC insider trading case.Regulator statement, 8 November 20111 record citedMarket conduct