RecordLens

Claim review. Fraud

Supported

The cited record supports the material proposition.

The Department of Justice said Allen Stanford was convicted on 13 of 14 counts and sentenced to 110 years in prison for a $7 billion investment fraud centred on the bank.

sentenced today in Houston to a total of 110 years in prison
About
Stanford International Bank Ltd
Claim made by
US Department of Justice, government press release
Published
14 June 2012
Original
Allen Stanford Sentenced to 110 Years in Prison for Orchestrating $7 Billion Investment Fraud Scheme
Evidence score
94 How it was scored
Last reviewed
25 October 2026

Why this label

The DOJ release states a jury convicted Stanford on 13 of 14 counts on 6 March 2012 and that he misappropriated $7 billion from the bankS2. The court imposed a total sentence of 110 yearsS2. The Fifth Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence in October 2015, and the Supreme Court declined review in November 2016S3. The conviction is final. Stanford has denied wrongdoing throughoutS8, and that denial is recorded as a response. No record read shows the verdict disturbed.

Current procedural position

Convicted by jury on 6 March 2012, sentenced to 110 years on 14 June 2012S2. Fifth Circuit affirmed in October 2015, certiorari denied in November 2016S3. Final.

Record supporting the assessment

was convicted on 13 of 14 counts by a federal jury
S2 Tier A US Department of Justice, Allen Stanford Sentenced to 110 Years in Prison for Orchestrating $7 Billion Investment Fraud Scheme, 14 June 2012
the 110-year prison sentence for the conviction on 13 out of 14 counts
S3 Tier C JURIST, Supreme Court declines to review Stanford's Ponzi scheme conviction, November 2016

Conflicting or limiting record

No record located that conflicts with this assessment.

Evidence score: 94 of 100

The score grades how well the record establishes this assessment. It is not a score of Stanford International Bank Ltd. Score = source authority + directness + corroboration + procedural accuracy + currency + reproducibility.

ComponentPointsMaxReason
Source authorityIs the source competent to establish the proposition?2930A DOJ release and a federal appeals outcome establish the conviction.
DirectnessDoes the source state the proposition or only discuss adjacent facts?1920The release states the counts and the 110 year sentence.
CorroborationDo independent records support the same material point?1315Press reporting confirms the affirmance and the denial of certiorari.
Procedural accuracyDoes the record settle the procedural state the claim describes?1515Criminal conviction final after appeal and denial of certiorari.
CurrencyHas the record been checked against later developments?910Checked against appeal records through 2016 and later filings.
ReproducibilityCan a reader locate the passage and repeat the assessment?910The DOJ release is archived and public.
Total94100

Timeline

  1. Jury convicts Stanford on 13 of 14 countsS2
  2. Sentenced to 110 years in prisonS2
  3. Fifth Circuit affirms conviction and sentenceS3
  4. Supreme Court declines reviewS3

Related cases

  • United States v. Robert Allen StanfordUS District Court for the Southern District of Texas, appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Criminal. Not published.Stage: Conviction and 110 year sentence affirmed in October 2015, certiorari denied in November 2016S2S3. Final.
    • Fifth Circuit affirmsS3
    • Supreme Court declines reviewS3

Responses

  • Allen Stanford, 11 January 2016: He denied wrongdoing and said he did not misspend one penny ever.S8

Revision history

  • Assessment first published with label Supported.

Have a record that changes this assessment? See corrections and responses.

Sources

  1. S2Tier A Allen Stanford Sentenced to 110 Years in Prison for Orchestrating $7 Billion Investment Fraud SchemeUS Department of Justice. Government press release. 14 June 2012.Supports the jury conviction on 13 of 14 counts, the 110 year sentence and the $7 billion misappropriation. It does not cover the appeal.
  2. S3Tier C Supreme Court declines to review Stanford's Ponzi scheme convictionJURIST. Press report. November 2016.Supports the denial of certiorari and the Fifth Circuit affirmance of the criminal conviction. It gives no exact ruling dates.
  3. S8Tier C Stanford talks to BBC about appeal and life in jailCayman News Service. Press report. 11 January 2016.Reports Stanford's denial from a BBC 5Live interview. It records his assertion of innocence, not any finding.

Other claims about Stanford International Bank Ltd