A material part is supported, but the published wording goes beyond the record.
FTI Consulting said the court receiver recovered about US$2.7 billion on behalf of more than 18,000 defrauded investors of Stanford International Bank.
recovered to date on behalf of more than 18,000 defrauded investors
- Claim made by
- FTI Consulting, official report
- Published
- 2025
- Evidence score
- 70 How it was scored
- Last reviewed
- 25 October 2026
Why this label
FTI states $2.7 billion was recovered for more than 18,000 defrauded investorsS6. The receiver's counsel reported total recoveries of more than US$2.5 billion by 1 July 2024, which corroborates the recovery figureS7. The amount recovered is supported. The wording may read as money returned to investors. The records show distribution lags far behind. FTI says the first $100 million settlement was distributed in 2024S6, and the receiver's counsel described a planned billion-plus distribution still to be approvedS7. The recovery total is supported, but any suggestion investors were repaid goes beyond the record.
Current procedural position
Receivership open in the N.D. Texas SEC case. About US$2.7 billion recovered by 2025S6, with a first US$100 million distributed to victims in 2024S6S7.
Record supporting the assessment
Bringing Total Receivership Recoveries to More Than $2.5 Billion
recovered to date on behalf of more than 18,000 defrauded investors
Conflicting or limiting record
the first $100 million settlement was distributed to victims
Evidence score: 70 of 100
The score grades how well the record establishes this assessment. It is not a score of Stanford International Bank Ltd. Score = source authority + directness + corroboration + procedural accuracy + currency + reproducibility.
| Component | Points | Max | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source authorityIs the source competent to establish the proposition? | 19 | 30 | The receiver's counsel statement is reliable on recoveries, with FTI as the forensic firm. |
| DirectnessDoes the source state the proposition or only discuss adjacent facts? | 16 | 20 | Both sources state the recovery total directly. |
| CorroborationDo independent records support the same material point? | 12 | 15 | Two linked sources give close recovery figures. |
| Procedural accuracyDoes the record settle the procedural state the claim describes? | 8 | 15 | Recovery is a running total in an open receivership, not a final figure. |
| CurrencyHas the record been checked against later developments? | 7 | 10 | Figures run to 2024 and 2025, with later distributions still pending. |
| ReproducibilityCan a reader locate the passage and repeat the assessment? | 8 | 10 | Both pages are public. |
| Total | 70 | 100 |
Timeline
Related cases
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank, Ltd., et al.US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Civil. 3:09-cv-298-N.Stage: Final judgment entered 29 January 2025S9, affirmed by the Fifth Circuit on 1 April 2026S4, certiorari denied 5 October 2026S5.
Revision history
- Assessment first published with label Partly supported.
Have a record that changes this assessment? See corrections and responses.
Sources
- S7Tier B Baker Botts Client Stanford Receiver Collects $1.3 Billion From Bank Litigation Settlements, Bringing Total Receivership Recoveries to More Than $2.5 BillionBaker Botts LLP (counsel to the receiver). Company statement. 1 July 2024.Receiver counsel statement on total recoveries over $2.5 billion and a planned distribution. It does not give a completed distribution total.
- S6Tier D Recovering $2.7 Billion for 18,000 Victims of the Stanford Ponzi SchemeFTI Consulting. Commissioned report. 2025.Forensic firm account of recoveries of $2.7 billion and a first $100 million distribution. It is a self-published case study, not a court order.
- S4Tier A Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert Allen Stanford, No. 25-10387 (per curiam)US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Court judgment. 1 April 2026.Supports the affirmance of the civil judgment against Stanford and the use of collateral estoppel from the criminal case. Unpublished.
- S5Tier A Docket for 25-7624, Stanford v. Securities and Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States. Court filing. 5 October 2026.Supports the denial of certiorari in the civil case on 5 October 2026 and the chain of appeal dates. It does not state the question presented.
- S9Tier A SEC v. Robert Allen Stanford, et al., Litigation Release No. 26255US Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulator press release. 24 February 2025.Supports the final judgment entered against Stanford on 29 January 2025 in No. 3:09-cv-298-N and the disgorgement and penalty amounts. It does not cover the appeal.
Other claims about Stanford International Bank Ltd
- Supported94The SEC said on 17 February 2009 that Stanford International Bank ran a multi-billion dollar fraud, selling about $8 billion in certificates of deposit on false promises and fabricated return data.Regulator statement, 17 February 20092 records citedFraud
- Supported94The Department of Justice said Allen Stanford was convicted on 13 of 14 counts and sentenced to 110 years in prison for a $7 billion investment fraud centred on the bank.Government press release, 14 June 20122 records citedFraud
- Contradicted91Allen Stanford said in a 2016 BBC interview that he did not misspend any investor money.Press report, 11 January 20162 records citedFraud