The cited record supports the material proposition.
Petrobras agreed in January 2018 to pay US$2.95 billion to settle the US securities class action without admitting wrongdoing.
The agreement does not constitute any admission of wrongdoing or misconduct by Petrobras.
- Claim made by
- Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras, company statement
- Published
- 3 January 2018
- Evidence score
- 75 How it was scored
- Last reviewed
- 25 October 2026
Why this label
The company's filing states the amount, the two instalments and the no admission term, and says the deal would go to the federal court in the Southern District of New York for reviewS3. The DOJ release names the class case as In re Petrobras Securities Litigation, No. 14-cv-9662 in that courtS1. The SEC release refers to offsets for payments to investors under a related class action settlementS2, which is consistent. The court's approval order was not read for this record. A settlement with no admission is not a finding of liability.
Current procedural position
Agreement in principle announced on 3 January 2018 and submitted to the US District Court for the Southern District of New YorkS3. The approval order was not reviewed.
Record supporting the assessment
Petrobras has agreed to pay US$ 2.95 billion to resolve claims in two installments of US$983 million
The agreement does not constitute any admission of wrongdoing or misconduct by Petrobras.
Conflicting or limiting record
No record located that conflicts with this assessment.
Evidence score: 75 of 100
The score grades how well the record establishes this assessment. It is not a score of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras. Score = source authority + directness + corroboration + procedural accuracy + currency + reproducibility.
| Component | Points | Max | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source authorityIs the source competent to establish the proposition? | 20 | 30 | A company filing is competent for the terms it agreed. The court order was not read. |
| DirectnessDoes the source state the proposition or only discuss adjacent facts? | 19 | 20 | The filing states the amount and the no admission term. |
| CorroborationDo independent records support the same material point? | 10 | 15 | The SEC and DOJ releases refer to the class settlement and its offset. |
| Procedural accuracyDoes the record settle the procedural state the claim describes? | 10 | 15 | An agreement in principle, with court approval not confirmed here. |
| CurrencyHas the record been checked against later developments? | 6 | 10 | Later steps in the class case were not reviewed within the search limit. |
| ReproducibilityCan a reader locate the passage and repeat the assessment? | 10 | 10 | The filing is on sec.gov. |
| Total | 75 | 100 |
Timeline
- Class action settlement in principle announcedS3
Related cases
- In the Matter of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - PetrobrasUS Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulatory. File No. 3-18843.Stage: Settled
- In re Petrobras Securities LitigationUS District Court for the Southern District of New York. Civil. No. 14-cv-9662.Stage: Settlement in principle announced on 3 January 2018 and submitted for court review
Responses
- Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras, 3 January 2018: Petrobras said the agreement is not an admission of wrongdoing and described itself as a victim of the scheme.S3
Revision history
- Assessment first published with label Supported.
Have a record that changes this assessment? See corrections and responses.
Sources
- S3Tier B Petrobras Signs Agreement in Principle to Settle Class Action in the U.S.Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras. Company filing. 3 January 2018.Company statement of the class action terms and its victim position.
- S2Tier A Petrobras Reaches Settlement With SEC for Misleading InvestorsUS Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulator press release. 27 September 2018.Supports the SEC charge and the amounts with offsets. It states no admit or deny language.
- S5Tier A In the Matter of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras, Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist ProceedingsUS Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulator order. 27 September 2018.SEC order in File No. 3-18843 with disgorgement of US$711 million, interest of US$222,473,797 and a US$853.2 million penalty. The order records that Petrobras admits the Commission's jurisdiction. The fetched text showed no admit or deny wording. The en dash in the original caption is shown as a hyphen.
- S1Tier A Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Agrees to Pay More Than $850 Million for FCPA ViolationsUS Department of Justice. Regulator press release. 27 September 2018.Supports the non-prosecution agreement, the penalty split and the described conduct. The en dash in the original title is shown as a hyphen.Link working, checked 25 October 2026
Other claims about Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras
- Supported88The US Justice Department said in September 2018 that Petrobras executives facilitated hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes to Brazilian politicians and parties and concealed them in the company's books.Regulator statement, 27 September 20185 records citedBribery
- Partly supported79Petrobras said in January 2018 that it was a victim of the Lava Jato scheme.Company statement, 3 January 20185 records citedBribery
- Unresolved49Poder360 reported in September 2023 that Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Dias Toffoli annulled all evidence from Odebrecht's 2016 leniency agreement used in Lava Jato accusations and convictions.Press report, 6 September 20233 records citedBribery