A material part is supported, but the published wording goes beyond the record.
Petrobras said in January 2018 that it was a victim of the Lava Jato scheme.
As a victim of the scheme
- Claim made by
- Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras, company statement
- Published
- 3 January 2018
- Evidence score
- 79 How it was scored
- Last reviewed
- 25 October 2026
Why this label
The Justice Department release describes an embezzlement scheme run by some executives that victimized the company and its shareholdersS1. The same release says senior executives facilitated bribes and concealed them in the books, and Petrobras admitted failures to keep accurate recordsS1. The SEC said the company's own financial statements misled US investorsS2. Petrobras paid US penalties and agreed to pay US$2.95 billion to investorsS2S3. The record supports that Petrobras was harmed by the scheme. It does not support describing the company only as a victim, since US authorities held the company responsible for its books and disclosures.
Current procedural position
Company statement of 3 January 2018S3. US resolutions of 27 September 2018 hold the company responsible for books and disclosure failuresS1S2.
Record supporting the assessment
embezzlement scheme that victimized the company and its shareholders
As a victim of the scheme, Petrobras has already recovered R$1.475 billion in restitution in Brazil
Conflicting or limiting record
Petrobras has agreed to pay a total of $933 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and an $853 million penalty
entered into a non-prosecution agreement
Petrobras failed to detect and disclose these corruption schemes.
Evidence score: 79 of 100
The score grades how well the record establishes this assessment. It is not a score of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras. Score = source authority + directness + corroboration + procedural accuracy + currency + reproducibility.
| Component | Points | Max | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source authorityIs the source competent to establish the proposition? | 26 | 30 | The DOJ and SEC records are competent for how US authorities treated the company. |
| DirectnessDoes the source state the proposition or only discuss adjacent facts? | 15 | 20 | The records address victim status and responsibility, but not in one statement. |
| CorroborationDo independent records support the same material point? | 12 | 15 | DOJ, SEC and the company's own filing point the same way. |
| Procedural accuracyDoes the record settle the procedural state the claim describes? | 10 | 15 | Settled resolutions with accepted facts, no trial findings. |
| CurrencyHas the record been checked against later developments? | 6 | 10 | Later Brazilian developments were only partly reviewed. |
| ReproducibilityCan a reader locate the passage and repeat the assessment? | 10 | 10 | All documents are public. |
| Total | 79 | 100 |
Timeline
Related cases
- United States and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - PetrobrasUS Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section. Criminal. Not stated in the sources read.Stage: Non-prosecution agreement
- Non-prosecution agreement with US$853.2 million in penalties, 80 percent to BrazilS1
- In the Matter of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - PetrobrasUS Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulatory. File No. 3-18843.Stage: Settled
Revision history
- Assessment first published with label Partly supported.
Have a record that changes this assessment? See corrections and responses.
Sources
- S1Tier A Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras Agrees to Pay More Than $850 Million for FCPA ViolationsUS Department of Justice. Regulator press release. 27 September 2018.Supports the non-prosecution agreement, the penalty split and the described conduct. The en dash in the original title is shown as a hyphen.Link working, checked 25 October 2026
- S3Tier B Petrobras Signs Agreement in Principle to Settle Class Action in the U.S.Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras. Company filing. 3 January 2018.Company statement of the class action terms and its victim position.
- S2Tier A Petrobras Reaches Settlement With SEC for Misleading InvestorsUS Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulator press release. 27 September 2018.Supports the SEC charge and the amounts with offsets. It states no admit or deny language.
- S5Tier A In the Matter of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras, Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist ProceedingsUS Securities and Exchange Commission. Regulator order. 27 September 2018.SEC order in File No. 3-18843 with disgorgement of US$711 million, interest of US$222,473,797 and a US$853.2 million penalty. The order records that Petrobras admits the Commission's jurisdiction. The fetched text showed no admit or deny wording. The en dash in the original caption is shown as a hyphen.
Other claims about Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras
- Supported88The US Justice Department said in September 2018 that Petrobras executives facilitated hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes to Brazilian politicians and parties and concealed them in the company's books.Regulator statement, 27 September 20185 records citedBribery
- Supported75Petrobras agreed in January 2018 to pay US$2.95 billion to settle the US securities class action without admitting wrongdoing.Company statement, 3 January 20182 records citedDisclosure
- Unresolved49Poder360 reported in September 2023 that Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Dias Toffoli annulled all evidence from Odebrecht's 2016 leniency agreement used in Lava Jato accusations and convictions.Press report, 6 September 20233 records citedBribery